In my partner Sharon's work, she has a good title for it. I think it make sense, her title is Sensation-Seeking, and her artilce is follow her title. The size font and color is great, I can see the title very clearly. My partner put her name in the webtext where is under the title. She has good webtext chunk between each paragraphs. I think she use Calibri for her webtext. She has very good images whice can help with illurstate her concept. In her web-text, there are four heardings, and each one is meaningful, these headings make her article clearly and well-organize. She add 7 hyperlinks through her web-text, what I think her hyperlink is useful because there are more information about sensation seeking, so if people feel confuse in her concept, they could use the hyperlink to look for example. Sharon's thesis statement is her first sentence in her text. Her text is closely follow her thesis. She has topic sentences for each section,and each sentence can very clearly to explain what the concept come next. She has many sources, some come from books and some from google scholar.
In Sharon's work, she has logos, her text is logical connection with good concepts. There is no ethos and pathos in her work, because she did not put her personal opinion and emotion in her text.
What I think is Sharon has a very nice work!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Wow, excellent work, Rick! =)
Your analysis of Sharon's text is simply wonderful.
Post a Comment